At what LTV does a bitcoin-backed loan get liquidated?
SALT prints a ladder from 75% to 90.91% LTV; Lava sets a price, not a ratio. We read four lenders' own pages and turned SALT's triggers into BTC falls.
Crypto lending, risk first
Filed under
9 articles
SALT prints a ladder from 75% to 90.91% LTV; Lava sets a price, not a ratio. We read four lenders' own pages and turned SALT's triggers into BTC falls.
Unchained, SALT, APX Lending and Ledn each publish a promise about reusing bitcoin collateral. We read all four word for word and graded who can check it.
Ledn says collateral is not lent for yield since May 2025, yet its own explainer allows re-posting to a funding partner. What its Open Book Report shows.
Blockaid's initial estimate put the MORE Markets drain at $9.3 million. The corrected figures reported four days later are roughly $410,000 at spot. What a lender should take from the gap.
The $8.7m the trackers reported matches the stablecoins the post-mortem traces off Base. What a forensic report published on the protocol's forum a day later adds is a different number: $9.13m of borrower obligations still outstanding. The mechanism is not a vote and not a broken contract, but a donation to a market contract and a price feed that believed it.
An attacker bought majority control of a thinly held governance token, passed proposals against Term Finance's strategy vaults and moved roughly $8.5 million out. The contracts executed exactly as written.
Coinbase, Uniswap and Crypto.com each ship a lending or borrowing button with their own branding on it. The documented integrations keep pointing at one shared backend, and that is a risk question.
The word does real persuasive work on a landing page. Read closely, a great deal of it describes something narrower than customers assume — and sometimes nothing at all.
The crypto lending sector ran two models. One of them is largely gone, and the reason is structural rather than accidental.